The Subjunctive Without Limits

The past subjunctives, the whole trigger inventory, and the one relic that still survives in law

At B1 you met the present subjunctive and its triggers. At B2 you met the past subjunctive inside si-clauses. Both times the subjunctive arrived as a list of situations to memorise. That is the right way to start, and it is not how the subjunctive actually works.

The subjunctive is not a tense and it is not a list. It is a mood — a grammatical declaration that what follows is not being asserted as fact. Once you hear it that way, the list dissolves: quiero que vengas, no creo que venga, busco a alguien que venga and aunque venga stop being four rules and become one instinct.

This lesson finishes the job. It gives you the past subjunctives in full, the complete trigger inventory (including the ones no B2 course teaches), the subjunctive in relative and concessive clauses, and the future subjunctive — a form that died in speech four centuries ago and is still waiting for you in any contract you sign.

1. El imperfecto de subjuntivo — both sets

One stem, two endings. Take the third-person plural of the preterite, strike the -ron, and add either set:

Infinitive3pl preterite-ra set-se set
hablarhablaronhablara, hablaras, hablara, habláramos, hablarais, hablaranhablase… hablásemos… hablasen
comercomieroncomiera… comiéramos… comierancomiese… comiésemos… comiesen
tenertuvierontuviera… tuviéramos…tuviese… tuviésemos…
ser / irfueronfuera… fuéramos…fuese… fuésemos…
decirdijerondijera… dijéramos…dijese… dijésemos…
haberhubieronhubiera… hubiéramos…hubiese… hubiésemos…
Every irregular preterite you already own is an irregular imperfect subjunctive you already own. There is no second list to learn — supieron → supiera, anduvieron → anduviera, condujeron → condujera, quisieron → quisiera. Note only the written accent in the nosotros form.

Are the two sets identical? As subjunctives, yes — si tuviera dinero and si tuviese dinero say exactly the same thing. -se is somewhat more literary and rather more Peninsular; -ra dominates in the Americas and in speech everywhere. But -ra can do two jobs -se cannot, and that asymmetry is a C1 marker.

2. The two jobs only -ra can do

(a) The literary pluperfect indicative

In journalism, historical writing and solemn prose, -ra is sometimes used where the indicative había + participle belongs. It is not a subjunctive at all here — it is a Latin survival.

La ciudad que fundara Pizarro en 1535 conserva su trazado original.
The city Pizarro had founded in 1535 keeps its original layout. (= que había fundado)

Volvió al pueblo donde naciera su madre. — …where his mother had been born.

Recognise it; do not imitate it. Used by a learner in ordinary prose it reads as a mistake or as parody. Its home is the newspaper feature and the historical essay. *que fundase Pizarro is impossible — this use is -ra only.

(b) A softened conditional

With four verbs — querer, poder, deber, haber — the -ra form can replace the conditional to sound more tentative and more courteous.

NeutralSoftened (-ra)Force
Quiero hablar con usted.Quisiera hablar con usted.I should like a word — markedly polite
Deberías avisarle.Debieras avisarle.Gentle, slightly literary reproach
Podría ser un error.Pudiera ser un error.Hedged, cautious — common in reports
Habría preferido saberlo.Hubiera preferido saberlo.Regret, fully standard in speech

*Quisiese hablar con usted does not exist. If it is doing conditional work, it is -ra.

3. El pluscuamperfecto de subjuntivo

hubiera / hubiese + participio — the mood for a past that did not happen.

No creía que hubieran terminado tan pronto. — I didn't think they had finished so soon.

Si hubieras avisado, te habríamos esperado. — If you had let us know, we would have waited.

Si hubieras avisado, te hubiéramos esperado. — the same sentence, with -ra standing in for habríamos. Fully standard, extremely common.

The swap runs one way only. Hubiera esperado for habría esperado: yes. *Hubiese esperado in that result clause: no. And *habría after si is an error in every variety — the mistake that most reliably marks a non-native (or a careless native).

4. The full trigger inventory

B1 gave you WEIRDO. Here is what an educated speaker actually operates, grouped by what the subjunctive is doing.

JobTriggersExample
Imposing a willquerer, pedir, exigir, rogar, ordenar, impedir, conseguir, lograr queExigieron que dimitiera.
Reacting emotionallyalegrarse de, lamentar, temer, sorprender, molestar, dar pena queMe sorprende que no lo sepas.
Doubting / denyingdudar, negar, no creer, no parecer, no ser cierto queNiego que hubiera mala fe.
Valuinges lógico / normal / una pena / importante / mejor queEs normal que te cueste.
Correcting a wrong inferenceno es que … (sino que)No es que no quiera, es que no puedo.
Drawing a consequencede ahí que, de aquí queNadie avisó; de ahí que llegáramos tarde.
Presenting a fact as a topicel hecho de que, que + subject at the frontEl hecho de que renunciara lo dice todo.
Averting somethingno sea que, no vaya a ser queLlévate paraguas, no sea que llueva.
Conditioningsiempre que, con tal (de) que, a condición de que, salvo que, a menos que, a no ser que, en caso de queIré, siempre que me avisen.
Placing in the futurecuando, en cuanto, hasta que, mientras, una vez que (future reference)En cuanto llegue, te aviso.
Always, no exceptionsantes de que, para que, a fin de que, sin queSalió sin que nadie lo viera.
Pretendingcomo si, ni que (past subj. only)Habla como si fuera el jefe.
Two that reward attention. De ahí que is the single most useful C1 connector on this page: it packs "and that is why" into two words and takes the subjunctive without exception. No es que… is the polite machine for rejecting an assumption someone has just made about you — you will use it constantly.

5. Relative clauses: the antecedent decides

Inside a relative clause the mood is chosen by one question: do I know this thing exists?

Indicative — it existsSubjunctive — unknown, sought, or denied
Tengo un amigo que habla ruso.Busco un amigo que hable ruso.
Conozco a alguien que puede ayudarte.¿Conoces a alguien que pueda ayudarme?
Hay algo que me preocupa.No hay nada que me preocupe.
Hizo lo que le dijeron.Haz lo que te digan.

The contrast is not decoration — it changes the facts:

Necesito un piso que tenga ascensor. — I need a flat with a lift (any such flat; I have not found one).

Necesito el piso que tiene ascensor. — I need the flat with the lift (that specific one; we both know it).

Note too the a: a specific known person takes personal a (Busco a mi hermana); an unspecified one usually does not (Busco una secretaria que sepa alemán). Lesson 7 returns to this.

6. Concession: aunque and its family

Aunque takes both moods, and the choice is about information status, not about truth.

MoodMeaningExample
IndicativeI am telling you this fact as newsAunque está lloviendo, salimos. (it is raining — you may not know)
Subjunctive (present)Hypothetical, or a fact we both already know and I am brushing asideAunque esté lloviendo, salimos. (rain or no rain / yes, it's raining, so what)
Subjunctive (past)Counterfactual concessionAunque me lo hubiera pedido, no habría ido.

The same split runs through the whole concessive family: a pesar de que, aun cuando, si bien (indicative, written), por mucho que, por más que, por poco que.

Por mucho que estudia, no aprueba. — However much he studies (and he does study — I am reporting it).

Por mucho que estudie, no aprobará. — However much he may study (hypothetical).

The reduplicated concessive

A pure C1 construction, and a beautiful one: the same verb in the subjunctive, twice, around a relative.

SpanishEnglish
Pase lo que paseWhatever happens
Sea como seaOne way or another / however it may be
Digan lo que diganWhatever people say
Venga quien vengaWhoever comes
Cueste lo que cuesteAt any cost
Quieras o noLike it or not

7. Como si — and its rude cousin

Como si takes only the imperfect or pluperfect subjunctive. Never the present, in any variety, ever.

Me trata como si fuera tonto. — He treats me as if I were stupid.

Entró como si no hubiera pasado nada. — She walked in as if nothing had happened.

✗ como si es, como si sea — both impossible.

¡Ni que…! is the same structure turned into sarcasm — "anyone would think…":

¡Ni que fueras millonario! — Anyone would think you were a millionaire!

¡Ni que lo hubiera hecho a propósito! — As if I'd done it on purpose!

8. El futuro de subjuntivo — the surviving relic

Spanish once had a third subjunctive tense. It vanished from speech around the seventeenth century, and it is still in force in law, because legal language does not update.

Formation: the imperfect subjunctive stem with -re endings — fuere, fueres, fuere, fuéremos, fuereis, fueren; tuviere, hubiere, viniere, supiere.

In statute: El que matare a otro será castigado… — Whosoever shall kill another… (the old Código Penal formula)

In contracts: Si alguna de las partes incumpliere lo pactado… — Should either party breach the agreement…

Frozen in the language: Sea lo que fuere — be that as it may; Adonde fueres, haz lo que vieres — when in Rome.

Your job is recognition. Nobody expects you to produce incumpliere. But when a lease, a judgment or a constitution puts it in front of you, you should read it as a plain conditional future — si incumpliere = si incumple — and not stall. Lesson 16 takes this further into legal Spanish.

Practice

Exercise 1: Form the imperfect subjunctive (-ra, 3rd sing.)

Exercise 2: Past subjunctives in context

Exercise 3: Indicative or subjunctive in the relative clause?

Exercise 4: The C1 triggers

Exercise 5: Concession — which mood, and why?

Give the form asked for.

Exercise 6: Complete the reduplicated concessive

Exercise 7: Read the relic

Rewrite the legal future subjunctive as ordinary modern Spanish (present indicative).

Where this takes you

You now have every mood form Spanish possesses. What comes next is not more forms but more architecture: Lesson 2 takes these clauses and stacks them, showing how an educated writer builds a sentence six clauses long that a reader still follows without effort — and how to take one apart when you meet it.